1/28/2025

Understanding DeepSeek's Verification Process: What Went Wrong?

In the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the advancements are rapid & continual, leading to groundbreaking breakthroughs in reasoning capabilities. One such development is DeepSeek's new models which are creating waves across the industry. However, there are a few bumps along the way, particularly concerning the verification process that could leave consumers scratching their heads. In this blog post, I’ll dive deep into understanding exactly what went wrong with DeepSeek’s verification process, as well as how it stacks against the well-established benchmarks set by competitors like OpenAI.

What is DeepSeek?

Founded in July 2023, DeepSeek is a Chinese AI company aiming to make Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) a reality. The company has positioned itself as a pioneer in open-source algorithm development (MIT Technology Review). They recently released their reasoning models: DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1, which utilize unique training methodologies that are garnering interest, especially when compared to OpenAI's offerings like the o1 model.

DeepSeek's R1 model has been praised for its performance, showing promise in reasoning tasks including math, logic, & coding challenges, rivaling the capabilities of OpenAI’s models (prompt hub).

DeepSeek’s Reasoning Models: Deep Dive

The release of the DeepSeek models, especially after their January 20th, 2025 drop, caused quite a stir among AI enthusiasts and scholars alike. By adopting an open-source approach, DeepSeek has made it possible for researchers to study not only the architecture of the models but also their underlying training processes (Nature).

Training Processes

DeepSeek’s DeepSeek-R1 is notable for its training through reinforcement learning (RL) alone, without any use of supervised fine-tuning (SFT), making it stand out amongst other models. R1 achieved various benchmarks that were previously dominated by OpenAI. Its unique feature includes the utilization of long Chain of Thought (CoT) ideas and self-verification processes, which allows the model to verify its own answers (seangoedecke).

Verification Challenges

However, with such groundbreaking achievements comes a host of challenges. The verification process used during the training phase faced significant issues. Here are a few key areas where things began to go downhill:

Language Mixing: One of the major hiccups in the DeepSeek verification process was the unintended mixing of English & Chinese responses. This problem was primarily due to the lack of supervised fine-tuning, leading to inconsistencies in the way output was generated.
Readability Issues: Originally, the model outputs were often difficult for users to comprehend. This was a barrier that limited usability, as stakeholders encountered challenges interpreting the results.
Lack of Reliable Outputs: Early verification attempts yielded outputs that sometimes lacked the coherence necessary for productive engagement. This was mainly because of the complexities involved in reasoning tasks where a clearer path is needed to ensure precision and accuracy during response generation.
Systematic Errors: Errors in the reasoning processes were also prevalent—such as the inability to deliver responses consistently across multiple iterations of a query. This made reliability a concern for various applications (Medium).
Output Formatting: A lack of rigorous formats initially, such as the presence of markers like
1<think>
or
1<answer>
tags meant that the output, while relevant, often lacked the visual or structural choices that aided in reading or comprehension.

The overall reliance on RL without established reliance on structured feedback loops may further obscure normally clear reasoning patterns seen in more traditional models used by OpenAI (Vellum).

Evaluating Performance Against Benchmarks

Despite its challenges, the performance metrics showcased by DeepSeek-R1 during verification phases have been remarkable when positioned against competitors. Benchmarks such as the AIME 2024 and various math competitions illustrated troublingly high success rates of 70%+ scoring on many tasks (arXiv).

However, to provide context, post-verification periods through OpenAI's models often yielded results with significantly fewer reported issues and higher reliability across understandability among users. Further complicating DeepSeek's verification success was its tendency to stumble through challenges that OpenAI appeared to navigate with greater agility.

Comparison of DeepSeek to OpenAI's Models

1. Reasoning Tasks Performance

DeepSeek-R1 recorded commendable fine-tuning on reasoning tasks, but OpenAI's o1 models consistently held the lead in rigor.
Success rates for R1 show promise, yet specific coding tasks remained challenging areas where OpenAI maintained a more successful scoring rates.

2. Readability Assessments

Models like OpenAI provide polished and coherent content from the outset, which DeepSeek is still working toward refining. Special attention is often directed towards human-aligned narratives within their outputs.

3. Flexibility in Usage

OpenAI stands on strong customization frontiers and adaptability across diverse user queries—benefits which users have called upon when deciding where to lean heavily in decision-making discussions (Biometric Update).

Promoting Arsturn: The Future of AI Chatbots

If you're fascinated by the world of AI & chatbots, Arsturn offers the perfect solution to streamline your engagements with users. Arsturn lets you instantly create custom ChatGPT chatbots on your website, boosting engagement & conversions effortlessly. With their easily deployable platforms requiring no coding skills, you can take control of your audience interactions through conversational AI that feels personal & authentic. Sign up for 【free at Arsturn](https://arsturn.com/) today!

Conclusion

In the midst of all these complexities, DeepSeek is undeniably a trailblazer with the potential to significantly change the field of reasoning in AI. However, the hurdles associated with verification processes remain pivotal for them to overcome as they strive to become direct competitors to established entities like OpenAI. As we observe DeepSeek evolve its strategies, we’ll likely see more streamlined outputs that are coherent, reliable, & capable of sustaining in a competitive digital space.

Stay tuned as the AI landscape continues to burgeon, granting accessibility to effective solutions for a myriad of users seeking out AI-driven models for their respective needs!