One of the major factors tainting the rise of porn generative AI is the blatant
violation of consent. In traditional forms of pornography, all actors are generally informed and agree to have their images shared; however, with AI-generated content, this fundamental aspect is thrown into disarray. As highlighted in a recent article by the
Washington Post, there are growing instances where individuals, especially women, are targeted without their consent, leading to what is termed as
image-based sexual abuse.
The consequences of non-consensual deepfake content can have devastating effects, especially for women. Many have reported feelings of anxiety, panic, depression,
and worse, leading to severe impacts on mental health and social interactions. According to
Health News statistics show that,
96% of deepfake videos are made without the subject's consent, leaving them vulnerable to harassment and abuse.
Many defenders of adult generative AI often argue that since AI models do not depend on real individuals, the ethical concerns diminish significantly. However, AI does not exist in a vacuum, and its models are often trained on content featuring real people. This raises questions of intellectual property and whether using likenesses of individuals without explicit consent lays a pathway for exploitation. If creators of AI-generated adult content do not recognize these implications, aren't they perpetuating the same pornographic exploitations they claim to combat?
The rise of AI-generated porn isn't just changing the medium but also the landscape of traditional pornography itself. As generative models improve, there's a tangible concern that human performers may face diminishing opportunities. According to discussions on
Reddit’s r/StableDiffusion, producers have started experimenting with AI to replace live actors, especially in niche markets that favors low-cost alternatives. The competitiveness in this industry raises existential questions—will human performers stand a chance against AI-generated content?