8/10/2025

Jan vs Ollama: A Friendly Showdown of Local AI Powerhouses

What’s up, everyone! If you've been diving into the world of local AI, you've DEFINITELY heard the names Jan & Ollama thrown around. It’s like the new Mac vs. PC debate, but for people who want to run their own AI models without sending their data to the cloud. Honestly, it’s a pretty exciting time to be alive if you're into this stuff.
So, what's the real deal? Is one truly better than the other? As someone who’s spent a good amount of time tinkering with both, I’m here to give you the lowdown. We're going to go deep into what makes each of these platforms tick, who they're for, & which one might be the right fit for you.

The Big Picture: What Are We Even Talking About?

First things first, let's get on the same page. Both Jan & Ollama are tools that let you run large language models (LLMs) on your own computer. Think of them as your personal, offline ChatGPT. This is a BIG deal for a few reasons:
  • Privacy: Your conversations stay on your machine. No prying eyes. This is HUGE for both personal privacy & for businesses handling sensitive data.
  • Customization: You can choose which models you want to use, tweak their settings, & really make the AI your own.
  • Offline Access: No internet? No problem. You can still chat with your AI.
But while they share this common goal, they go about it in pretty different ways. Jan is all about providing a polished, all-in-one desktop experience, while Ollama is more of a sleek, command-line-focused engine. It’s like comparing a fully-loaded SUV to a stripped-down, high-performance sports car. Both will get you where you want to go, but the ride is VERY different.

Jan: The "AI Computer" on Your Desktop

Jan's tagline is "Turn your computer into an AI computer," & honestly, that's a pretty good way to put it. It’s a desktop application for Mac, Windows, & Linux that’s designed to be a user-friendly, all-in-one solution for local AI.

The Jan Philosophy: Open, Private, & User-Owned

The team behind Jan, Menlo Research, is all about a few key principles that really shine through in their product:
  • Local-first: Everything is designed to run offline. Your data is your data, period.
  • Open Source: Jan is licensed under the AGPL, which means it's not just open source, but it also encourages anyone who builds on it to contribute back to the community.
  • User-owned: You have complete control over your data. It's stored in universal formats, so you're not locked into their ecosystem.
This philosophy is a big draw for folks who are tired of being the product. It’s a refreshing change of pace in a world where everything seems to be a subscription service that wants to harvest your data.

Jan's User Experience: A Polished & Intuitive UI

This is where Jan REALLY shines. It has a beautiful, intuitive user interface that feels a lot like using ChatGPT or Claude. You have a chat window, a list of your conversations, & an easy way to switch between different models. It's designed for people who don't want to mess around with command lines & configuration files.
Some of the key UI features include:
  • Model Hub: You can easily download & install models from the Jan Hub or import your own GGUF models from Hugging Face.
  • Cloud Integration: If you want to use more powerful models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Groq, you can easily connect your API keys & use them right from the Jan interface.
  • Custom Assistants: You can create specialized AI assistants for different tasks, which is a pretty cool feature for streamlining your workflow.
  • Local API Server: With a single click, you can start a local server that's compatible with the OpenAI API. This is awesome for developers who want to build applications on top of their local models.

The Not-So-Great Parts of Jan

No tool is perfect, & Jan has its quirks. Some users have reported that the Tauri-based app can feel a bit clunky on Linux. There have also been some complaints about the app making connections to GitHub & other sites, which can be a concern for purists who want a truly offline experience. Also, some users have found that it struggles with handling multiple models at once, blocking new requests until the previous one is finished.

Ollama: The Developer's Darling

If Jan is the user-friendly SUV, Ollama is the lean, mean, command-line machine. It's designed for developers & technical users who want a lightweight, high-performance way to run LLMs locally.

The Ollama Philosophy: Simplicity, Performance, & Extensibility

Ollama's approach is all about keeping things simple & efficient. It's a small, single-binary application that you interact with primarily through the command line. This has a few key advantages:
  • Lightweight: The installation is super small & it doesn't hog a ton of resources when it's not actively running a model.
  • Fast: On supported hardware, especially with a good GPU, Ollama is known for being incredibly fast.
  • Extensible: Ollama's simplicity makes it a great foundation to build on. There are a TON of third-party tools & web UIs that integrate with Ollama.

Ollama's User Experience: The Power of the Command Line

Ollama doesn't have its own official GUI. Instead, you interact with it through the terminal. This might sound intimidating to some, but it's actually incredibly powerful. Here are a few of the things you can do with a simple
1 ollama
command:
  • 1 ollama run llama3.2
    : This command will download & run the Llama 3.2 model, dropping you into a chat interface right in your terminal.
  • 1 ollama pull mistral
    : This will download the Mistral model to your machine.
  • 1 ollama list
    : This shows you all the models you have downloaded.
The real power of Ollama, though, is its API. Just like Jan, it exposes an OpenAI-compatible API that makes it super easy for other applications to use your local models. This has led to a thriving ecosystem of third-party tools.

The Rise of the Ollama Ecosystem

Because Ollama is so developer-friendly, a whole ecosystem of tools has sprung up around it. One of the most popular is Open WebUI, which was originally called
1 ollama-webui
. This project provides a beautiful, feature-rich web interface for Ollama that rivals Jan in terms of usability. It offers multi-model support, RAG with citations, & even multi-user workspaces.
This is a key difference between Jan & Ollama. With Jan, you get a great UI out of the box. With Ollama, you have to do a little bit of extra work to set up a UI, but you have a LOT more options to choose from.

The Downsides of Ollama

The biggest "con" for Ollama is the lack of an official UI. While there are great third-party options, it's an extra step that might be a barrier for less technical users. Some people also find the command-line-focused approach to be a bit opaque, especially when it comes to things like model quantization levels.

Head-to-Head Comparison: Jan vs. Ollama

Okay, let's put these two head-to-head in a few key categories.

Installation & Setup

  • Jan: Super easy. You download an installer for your operating system & run it. It's just like installing any other desktop application.
  • Ollama: Also very easy, but a bit different. On Mac & Windows, there are installers. On Linux, you run a simple command in your terminal.
Winner: Tie. Both are incredibly easy to get started with.

User Interface & Ease of Use

  • Jan: Has a polished, built-in UI that's great for non-technical users. It's an all-in-one solution.
  • Ollama: Is command-line based, which is great for developers but not so much for everyone else. However, with a little bit of effort, you can set up a fantastic web UI like Open WebUI.
Winner: Jan (out of the box). Ollama + Open WebUI is a strong contender, but it requires an extra step.

Performance & Hardware Requirements

This is a tricky one. Both platforms can leverage your GPU for faster performance, & the speed you get is going to depend heavily on your hardware.
  • Jan: The system requirements are pretty reasonable. For a 7B model, they recommend 16GB of RAM. Some users have reported that it has "amazing performance" & runs models incredibly well.
  • Ollama: Is generally considered to be very fast, especially on supported hardware. Red Hat did a benchmark comparing Ollama to vLLM (a high-performance production server) & found that while vLLM is faster at scale, Ollama is "ideal for local development & prototyping."
Winner: Too close to call. It really depends on your specific hardware & the models you're running.

Customization & Extensibility

  • Jan: Offers a good amount of customization, including the ability to create custom assistants & connect to cloud providers. It also has an experimental extensions system.
  • Ollama: Is built for extensibility. The entire ecosystem of third-party tools is a testament to this. You can easily create custom models with a
    1 Modelfile
    , which is similar to a
    1 Dockerfile
    .
Winner: Ollama. Its simple, open design has fostered a much larger & more vibrant ecosystem of third-party tools.

The Business Angle: Local AI in the Workplace

This is where things get REALLY interesting. Both Jan & Ollama have the potential to be game-changers for businesses. By running AI locally, companies can get all the benefits of large language models without the privacy risks of sending their data to a third-party cloud service.
Imagine a customer service team using a local AI to get instant, accurate answers to customer questions, all without any sensitive customer data ever leaving their network. Or a team of developers using a local AI to help them write & debug code, without having to worry about their proprietary code being leaked.
This is where a solution like Arsturn can come into play. While Jan & Ollama are fantastic for running the models, a business needs more than just a chat interface. They need a way to integrate AI into their existing workflows, to manage conversations at scale, & to provide a seamless experience for their customers.
Arsturn helps businesses build no-code AI chatbots trained on their own data. You could, in theory, use a locally hosted model with Ollama or Jan as the "brain" for your Arsturn chatbot. This would give you the best of both worlds: a powerful, customizable AI that you control, and a user-friendly, business-focused platform for deploying it. Arsturn helps businesses create custom AI chatbots that provide instant customer support, answer questions, & engage with website visitors 24/7, all while keeping your data secure.

So, Which One Should You Choose?

Here's the thing: there's no single "best" answer. It really depends on who you are & what you're trying to do.
Choose Jan if:
  • You're a non-technical user who wants a simple, all-in-one solution.
  • You want a polished, user-friendly interface right out of the box.
  • You value the "user-owned" philosophy & want a tool that's built with privacy as a top priority.
  • You want to easily switch between local models & cloud-based models from providers like OpenAI & Anthropic.
Choose Ollama if:
  • You're a developer or a technical user who is comfortable with the command line.
  • You want a lightweight, high-performance engine to build on.
  • You want to tap into a large & growing ecosystem of third-party tools & interfaces.
  • You love the idea of using
    1 Modelfiles
    to create your own custom models.

The Future is Local

Honestly, the fact that we even have tools like Jan & Ollama is a testament to how far the open-source AI community has come. Just a couple of years ago, the idea of running a powerful AI on your personal computer was a pipe dream. Now, it's not only possible, it's getting easier every day.
Whether you're a developer building the next great AI application, a business looking to leverage AI without compromising on privacy, or just a curious tinkerer who wants to see what all the fuss is about, there's never been a better time to dive into the world of local AI.
I hope this was helpful! Let me know what you think. Have you tried Jan or Ollama? Which one do you prefer? Drop a comment below & let's chat.

Copyright © Arsturn 2025