So, Your GPT-5 Is Losing the Plot? Here’s How to Fix Context Drift in Auto Mode
Z
Zack Saadioui
8/13/2025
So, Your GPT-5 Is Losing the Plot? Here’s How to Fix Context Drift in Auto Mode
Alright, let's talk about something that’s probably been driving you nuts if you're a heavy user of the latest AI models. You're deep into a complex conversation with GPT-5, maybe outlining a business plan or debugging some tricky code. Everything's flowing beautifully. The AI is your perfect creative partner, anticipating your next thought... & then it happens.
Out of nowhere, it completely loses the thread.
It might start referencing a topic you discussed an hour ago, switch its tone from technical to overly casual, or just give you a generic, unhelpful response that ignores the last ten messages of carefully constructed context. It’s like the AI has a sudden case of amnesia.
This, my friends, is "context drift," & if you've been noticing it with GPT-5's new "Auto Mode," you are NOT alone. Turns out, the very feature designed to make the model smarter & more efficient is also the source of this new, frustrating quirk.
But don't worry, it's not a lost cause. As someone who spends a TON of time in the trenches with these models, I've dug deep into why this happens & gathered a whole playbook of fixes, from simple prompt tweaks to more advanced architectural strategies. So grab a coffee, & let's get into it.
The Core Problem: What Exactly IS Context Drift in GPT-5?
First off, what are we even talking about? Context drift is when an AI model, in the middle of a continuous conversation, fails to maintain a consistent understanding of the ongoing dialogue. It loses track of key details, user intent, established tone, & logical flow.
With GPT-5, this seems to be happening a lot in its default "Auto Mode." Reddit threads & developer forums are full of examples. One user describes how the model will suddenly pivot from a technical outlining task to a relational, conversational style without any prompting. Another complains that in long-form creative writing, the narrative flow gets broken, losing all sense of immersion.
This isn't just about the model forgetting something from 50 prompts ago. We're seeing a more immediate & jarring loss of focus.
The culprit seems to be GPT-5's new underlying architecture. Instead of being one single, monolithic model, it acts more like a smart router. Based on your prompt, it decides which internal model is best for the job. Is it a simple question? Route it to a fast, lightweight model. Is it a complex reasoning task? Send it to the heavy-duty "thinking" model.
Sounds great in theory, right? Efficiency! Speed! But here's the kicker: when it switches between these sub-models, it doesn't always pass the full conversational context along perfectly. Each switch is a potential point of failure, a moment where the "memory" of the conversation gets fuzzy. It's like handing off a complex project between team members without a proper briefing. Details get dropped.
This is why you see those weird shifts. The model might switch to its "quick-response" sub-model & lose the nuance you've built up, or get stuck in "deep reasoning" mode on a poisoned context, as some security researchers have noted.
On top of that, we have the age-old problem of model drift, where frequent updates by OpenAI change the model's behavior, making your once-perfect prompts suddenly less effective. It’s a constant moving target.
Why LLMs Forget: A Peek Under the Hood
To really fix this, we need to understand the fundamental limitations we're working with. AI doesn't "remember" like a human. It relies on something called a context window.
Think of the context window as the model's short-term memory. It's a fixed amount of text (measured in "tokens," which are roughly words or parts of words) that the model can "see" at any given moment when generating a response. This includes your entire conversation history—your prompts & its replies.
GPT-3 had a context window of about 2,049 tokens. Today's models are MUCH larger. GPT-4o has 128,000, & some models from Anthropic & Google boast windows of 200,000 to even a million tokens.
But here's the thing: bigger isn't always better. Research has shown that even with massive context windows, models tend to pay the most attention to the beginning & the VERY end of the text (a concept called "U-shaped prompting"). Information buried in the middle can easily get lost. It's like trying to find a specific needle of information in a giant haystack of conversation.
This is related to a deeper concept in neural networks called catastrophic forgetting. At its core, a neural network learns by adjusting its internal "weights." When you train it on a new task, it updates those weights. But in doing so, it can overwrite the weights that were crucial for a previous task. It learns the new thing so hard it forgets the old thing. This is why fine-tuning a model can sometimes feel like a monkey's paw—you gain a new skill but might lose some general capabilities.
So, when GPT-5's auto-router switches models, it's not just a simple handoff. It might be engaging a model that has been fine-tuned differently, or the mechanism for transferring the "memory" (the context) is imperfect, leading to a mini-case of catastrophic forgetting right in the middle of your chat.
The Fixes: From Simple Tricks to Advanced Strategies
Okay, that's the "why." Now for the "how to fix it." I've broken this down into three levels, from stuff you can do right now in the chat window to bigger strategies for developers & businesses.
These are the immediate, practical things you can do to manage context in any long conversation. Think of it as giving the AI guardrails.
Be the Captain of Your Conversation: Don't let the conversation just meander. Be explicit. If you're switching topics, announce it. Instead of "now for that other thing," say: "Okay, I'm switching topics completely. I now want to discuss marketing strategies for the product we just outlined." This forces the model to re-anchor.
The Power of the Summary: This is my go-to trick. When a conversation gets long (say, more than 10-15 back-and-forths), the context window starts getting cluttered. The fix? Ask the AI to summarize the key points so far.
Prompt:
1
"Summarize the most important decisions, facts, & goals from our conversation so far into a concise bulleted list."
You can then use this summary to start a fresh chat, or even just paste it back into the current chat every few turns to "remind" the AI what's important. This is HUGE for maintaining logical consistency.
Front-Load Your Context: Since we know models pay more attention to the beginning & end of a prompt, use that to your advantage. At the start of a new, complex prompt within a long conversation, re-state the most critical piece of information.
Example:
1
"Okay, remembering that the target audience is software developers (the key constraint we established), let's generate some ad copy."
Structure is Everything: Don't just dump a wall of text. Break your prompts down. A user on Reddit shared a great structure that works wonders:
Context: Briefly explain the background.
Role: Tell the AI who it should be (e.g., "You are a senior marketing analyst").
Task: Clearly state what you want it to do.
Do's & Don'ts: Give it explicit constraints.
Output Format: Specify if you want a table, JSON, bullet points, etc.
Create an "Artifact": This is a more advanced concept of "interaction hygiene." As you're iterating in a messy chat, you'll eventually get a piece of output that is PERFECT. A great paragraph, a correct block of code, a well-structured table. Treat this as a golden "artifact." Copy it out of the chat. Name it. Then, in a new prompt, you can re-seed the conversation with this perfect artifact, saying "Using this as the standard, continue with the next section." This separates the messy process from the clean product.
Level 2: Technical Workarounds & Model Selection
If you're building applications on top of GPT-5, you have more control. Here's where you can get more technical.
Ditch Auto Mode for Critical Tasks: The simplest solution is often the best. If you're using the API, you can often specify which model to use. Instead of using a generic "latest" endpoint that might route your request, pin your application to a specific model version, like
1
gpt-5
(the reasoning model) instead of
1
gpt-5-chat-latest
. Yes, you might miss out on some speed optimizations, but you gain predictability, which is EVERYTHING for a production system.
Use Function Calling & Tools: Offload state management from the model's brain. Instead of expecting the LLM to remember the entire state of a game or a user's profile, keep that information in your own application logic. Use the LLM's function calling ability to have it ask for the information it needs. For example, instead of it remembering a user's previous orders, it can call a function
1
get_user_order_history()
from your system. This keeps the LLM focused on language & reasoning, not memorization.
Implement a "Sliding Window" with Summaries: This is a more robust version of the summarization trick. In your application, don't just send the entire chat history with every API call. Keep a rolling window of, say, the last 10 messages. For messages older than that, create a running summary. Your context for each new message would look something like this:
1
[Running Summary of Messages 1-30]
1
[Full text of Messages 31-40]
1
[New User Prompt]
This is a fantastic way to manage a near-infinite conversation without hitting context limits or losing key information.
Level 3: Enterprise-Grade Solutions with RAG & Custom Chatbots
For businesses, context drift isn't just an annoyance; it's a customer service nightmare. Imagine a support bot that forgets a user's problem halfway through the conversation. This is where you need to think architecturally.
The two big approaches here are Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) & Fine-Tuning.
Fine-Tuning involves taking a base model & training it further on your own specific data. This can be powerful for teaching the model a specific style, tone, or format. However, it's expensive, time-consuming, & as we discussed, can lead to catastrophic forgetting. You might make it an expert on your product's API but find it's no longer good at friendly conversation.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is, honestly, the more flexible & powerful solution for most businesses today. Instead of trying to cram all your company's knowledge into the model's brain (fine-tuning), you connect the model to an external knowledge base (your product docs, support articles, past tickets, etc.). When a user asks a question, the system first retrieves the most relevant documents from your knowledge base & then augments the model's prompt with that information, telling it, "Here's the user's question, & here is the exact information you need to answer it."
This solves context drift in a business setting beautifully. The model doesn't need to "remember" your company's entire product catalog. It just needs to be good at answering a question based on the context it's given right now. The knowledge can be updated in real-time without retraining the model.
This is exactly the kind of problem we're passionate about at Arsturn. We see businesses struggle with generic chatbot solutions that feel disconnected & unhelpful. That's why we built a platform that makes creating a RAG-based AI so much easier. With Arsturn, you can build a no-code AI chatbot trained specifically on your own data. You just upload your documents, website content, or support guides, & it creates a chatbot that can provide instant, accurate customer support 24/7. It's not just a generic LLM; it's your LLM, grounded in your business's reality. It doesn't suffer from context drift about your products because it's retrieving the correct context for every single query.
For businesses looking to automate customer service, generate leads, or just engage website visitors more effectively, this approach is a game-changer. You're not fighting the model's memory limitations; you're giving it the perfect memory aid every single time. This allows you to build meaningful, personalized connections with your audience at scale.
Tying It All Together
So, here's the thing. Context drift in GPT-5's Auto Mode is a real, tangible problem stemming from its new, complex routing architecture. It's a manifestation of the fundamental limitations of how LLMs handle memory.
But it's far from unsolvable.
For personal use, it's about developing good "interaction hygiene"—being explicit, summarizing often, & structuring your prompts. For developers, it's about choosing the right tools, pinning models, & offloading state. & for businesses, it's about moving beyond generic models & adopting a more robust, context-aware architecture like RAG.
The key takeaway is to stop thinking of the AI as a perfect, all-knowing oracle & start treating it like an incredibly powerful but sometimes forgetful intern. You need to manage it, guide it, & give it the right information to succeed.
Hope this was helpful. It's a fascinating, fast-moving space, & we're all learning the best practices together. Let me know what you think, & if you have any other tricks that have worked for you